Category Archive for: ‘Uncategorized’

New Overtimes Rules Start December 1, 2016 

With the holidays right around the corner it is important to make sure your company is in compliance with the new overtime rules that will effect over 390,000 California employees. The U.S. Department of Labor (“DOL”) has announced the highly anticipated federal overtime rule under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”).  According to the White House, an estimated 4.2 million …

Read More

Ninth Circuit Holds individual testimony regarding damages does not defeat class certification

The Ninth Circuit recently affirmed the United States District Court’s granting a motion for class certification holding where a complaint alleges a company violated the law in the same way as to each member of a large class of employees, finding class certification is proper.  “[T]he need for individual damages calculations does not, alone, defeat class certification.” Vaquero v. Ashley …

Read More

Governor Brown Signs California Fair Pay Act

California women will now enjoy the most specific laws in the United States aimed at requiring equal pay for equal work while concurrently fighting employers in discrimination claims. With the signing of SB 358 by Senator Hannah-Beth Jackson (D-Santa Barbara) – Conditions of employment: gender wage differential- the state of California’s wage laws are now the toughest in the country. Existing …

Read More

Uber DLSE Ruling Finds Driver an Employee

California’s labor commissioner, known as the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (“DLSE”) has ruled that a driver for Uber should be classified as an employee of the company, a decision that marks the latest setback for the ride-hailing company’s labor model. The ruling doesn’t set a precedent for how Uber compensates its 200,000 drivers, but it is one of a …

Read More

Re-Hire Bans May Be Banned -Golden v. California Emergency Physicians

Something we often see when a case settles is that employers prefer to include a “no re-hire” provision in their agreement. What, you were harassed, sued, settled and now want your job back? You may be in luck. Read on – The rationale for these clauses is that any refusal to hire the plaintiff in the future could be characterized …

Read More

Court Holds Electronic Signature Not Enough to Compel Arbitration

In Ruiz v. Moss Bros. Auto Group Inc.,(2014) 232 Cal. App.4th 836, an auto parts company cannot enforce its agreement to arbitrate employment disputes individually in a class action case since  it failed to prove the authenticity of an employee’s electronic signature on the agreement. An official of Moss Bros. Auto Group failed to present sufficient evidence in her statement that the employee actually signed the agreement, …

Read More

Felix v. AAA – UPDATE- Checks Delivered to Claims Administrator 2.10.15

It was just reported to our office that checks were delivered to the claims administrator. We will follow up and report when they are being mailed. Please make sure they have your updated address, phone and email. Krista Tittle • Simpluris, Inc. | Class Action Settlement Administration 3176 Pullman Street, Suite 123, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Toll Free: (800) …

Read More

Update of California Employment Laws 2015

It is that time of year again for California employers revisit their policies and handbooks to assess compliance with the slew of new California employment laws that take effect on January 1, 2015, or shortly thereafter. This year there is something for everyone: (1) an expansion of harassment training requirement, (2) a law that requires paid sick time for almost …

Read More

Timeline for Felix v. AAA Class Member Checks Released

According to the claims administrator, Simpluris, the timeline for the class member distribution is as follows: 12/05/2014 – Disbursement Database sent to Counsel 12/10/2014 – Deadline for Disbursement Database to be approved by the parties 12/10/2014 – Deadline for Defendant to provide checks to Simpluris 12/17/2014 – Deadline for Simpluris to mail Defendant issued checks Please let me know if …

Read More

Carter v. Entercom Sacramento – Court holds employee not entitled to reimbursement for Cumis Counsel when Employers carrier agrees to provide counsel without reservation of rights under California Labor Code section 2802

A Sacramento radio station hosted a contest that offered a prize to the contestant who could drink the most water without going to the bathroom. Entercom Sacramento, LLC assigned employee Matt Carter to assist in conducting the contest. Contestant Jennifer Strange died of hyponatremia after participating in the contest. Her survivors sued Entercom, Carter, and others. Carter tendered defense of …

Read More

Page 1 of 3123»

Quintilone & Associates focuses in Class Actions, Employment Law, Personal Injury, and Business Litigation in Orange County, CA area.